Trauma: a stress during pandemic?

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic significantly impacted on trauma systems, since emergency departments (ED) suddenly were overwhelmed by patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Once, trauma volume was supposed to decrease due to lockdown policies, we aimed to describe ICU trauma admissions during this period. Method(s): Retrospective observational study of all trauma patients admitted to the ICU of a Portuguese Trauma Center between January 2020 and December 2021. Data were collected from clinical hospital records. Result(s): 437 trauma patients (15% of all admissions), mostly male (71%), with a median age of 59 years-old (42-74) were included. At least one comorbidity was present in 71% of the patients. Median severity scores were: SAPS II 26 (19-38), SOFA 3 (1-6), ISS 13 (9-22), RTS 8 (6-8) and TRISS 96,75 (81.1-98.6). The most frequent mechanisms of injury were falls (59%) and road traffic accidents (25%). The majority consisted of blunt trauma (88%), 65% of brain trauma and 35% of musculoeskeletal trauma. Trauma Team assessment was started in < 3 min in all cases and median length of stay (LOS) in the ED was 261 min (154-418). Surgical intervention was performed in < 4 h in 56% of surgical brain trauma injuries, in < 6 h in 67% of extremity open fractures and in < 1 h in 6% of a penetrating trauma. Shock, mainly hemorrhagic, was present in 8% of the patients on hospital admission. 38% were submitted to invasive mechanical ventilation and 34% to vasopressors. The most common complication was nosocomial infection (18%). The median LOS in the UCI was 12 days (5-24). Only 8% of the patients died in the ICU and 11% in the hospital. Conclusion(s): During pandemic, trauma persisted a major health problem with a significant consumption of time and critical care resources. The high influx of patients may have influenced the LOS in the ED before ICU admission and the time until the surgical intervention. Despite it, mortality remained low.

Changes in adult trauma at a level 1 trauma center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Prior research has shown the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with changes in ED volumes, trauma caseloads and distribution of disease. Objectives: We aim to characterize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic at a diverse, high-volume Level 1 trauma center in the US. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional trauma registry at our center from 2018 through 2021 to study changes before and after COVID-19. We established March 14 - December 31 as the study period of interest for each year. We analyzed the data with descriptive statistics and created Poisson regression models to determine the estimated percentage year-to-year changes. Results: Total number of trauma cases increased with each subsequent year from 2018 (N â€‹= â€‹4605) to 2021 (N â€‹= â€‹7331) (total N â€‹= â€‹23,727). In general, the proportion of Black or African American patients increased over time (2018: 19.2%, 2021: 23.0%). The proportion of patients insured by Medicaid (8.0% vs 10.5%) and Medicare (26.5% vs 32.8%) increased from 2018 to 2021. Comparing 2019 to 2020, we found increases in violent traumas: GSW (+88.6%, 95% CI 63.8%-117.2%) and stabbings (+39.6%, 95% CI 8.1%-80.3%). Trauma patient ED LOS decreased from 300 â€‹min (67-400 IQR) in 2018 to 249 â€‹min in 2021 (104-510 IQR). Conclusion: This analysis identified increased trauma volumes, especially violent trauma (GSW, stabbing, other penetrating). There was a greater proportion of Black/African American patients and those insured with Medicare or Medicaid during the pandemic. TED LOS decreased over time while ED mortality and hospital LOS remained stable.

Thoracic trauma profile: what changed with covid-19

Introduction: Thoracic injuries are injuries to the chest wall and organs within the chest cavity, Most often on public road accidents or aggression sometimes iatrogenic. The management of chest wall injuries requires a multidisciplinary approach, underlined by multimodal pain management and sometimes surgical intervention. Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective comparative descriptive study of the profile of thoracic trauma during the period of covid (lockdown) and after lockdown over 2 periods of 3 months, in the emergency, the intensive care unit and the surgery department of our hospital. Result(s): In our study they were included all the patients who required a management of a thoracic trauma isolated or associated to other points of impact. 217 cases were included in the study of which the predominance of the male sex is noted, the closed trauma dominated in the period of the confinement compared to the penetrating trauma with a ratio of 1,4 thing that was reversed after the confinement where the penetrating trauma dominates as cause of trauma due most often to the agressions by knife. In 80% of the cases the use of CT scan was necessary and thoracic drainage was done in 69% of the cases and the use of surgery was necessary in 1% of the cases. Conclusion(s): Covid-19 influenced the trauma profile of thoracic trauma patients, which was temporary with an immediate return to the usual parameters after lockdown.

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Major Trauma Treated at a Level I Trauma Centre.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The paper aims to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on a change in the number of major trauma cases, their mechanism and length of hospital stay as seen by a Level I Trauma Centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS The retrospective study included a total of 755 major trauma patients (ISS >= 16) treated at our Level I Trauma Centre in the period 2018-2019 ("pre-COVID-19 time") and 2020-2021 ("COVID-19 time"). The effect of COVID-19 infection on the change in the number and nature of major trauma, mechanism of injury, length of treatment during prehospital care, length of hospital stay, and mortality. RESULTS Of the total number of 755 patients with major trauma, in the "pre-COVID-19 time" 399 patients were treated, while in the "COVID-19 time" it was 356 patients (p = 0.10). The mechanism of major trauma did not change, road traffic accidents prevailed (61% vs. 56%, p = 0.25), the proportion of injuries due to falls from height increased (25% vs. 32.5%, p = 0.08), a significant decrease was observed in the category of severe skiing injuries (7 vs. 2, p = 0.003). The severity of injuries evaluated by Injury Severity Score remained unchanged (25 vs. 25, p = 0.08), but an increased number of patients with trau-matic brain injury (TBI) marked by the Abbreviate Injury Score (AIS) >= 4 was observed (38 vs. 56, p = 0.03). The total length of a hospital stay shortened (18 vs. 15 days, p = 0.04), but the mortality rate spiked (52 vs. 73 patients, p = 0.08). DISCUSSION In the "COVID-19 time", the total number of major trauma cases dropped just like in the other European countries. Despite restrictive measures imposing mobility restrictions, no change was reported in the mechanism of injury, with traffic accidents still prevalent, except for skiing injuries. Unlike the US, we did not see an increase in penetrating injuries due to interpersonal violence or suicidal behaviour. However, there was an increase in the percentage of patients with an isolated TBI as a result of a fall from height. An increase in mortality was reported due to an increase in severe TBI. The length of hospital stay was reduced as a result of efforts to maintain hospital bed availability. CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the two years immediately preceding, no significant decrease in the number of major trauma cases was reported, despite the introduction of restrictive measures. The proportion of road traffic injuries remained the same, whereas the number of falls from height slightly increased, which consequently led to an increase in the number of severe TBI. The number of penetrating injuries due to acts of violence did not increase, but due to the lockdown there was a significant decrease in severe skiing-related injuries. The anti-epidemic measures in place did not prolong the pre-hospital care for severely injured patients.Copyright © 2022, Galen s.r.o.. All rights reserved.

Shelter in Place and an Alarming Increase in Penetrating Trauma in Children and Concerning Decrease in Child Abuse.

BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2020, schools across North Carolina (NC) closed in response to Covid-19, forcing completion of the school year at home. Most pediatric trauma occurs at home with a higher prevalence when children are out of school. We queried the state trauma database to assess if the 2020 "shelter in place" was associated with an increase in pediatric trauma statewide. METHODS: The NC trauma database was queried for injuries in children (age < 18 yrs) from 13 March-1 August 2020, and the corresponding months of 2018 and 2019. The number and type of injuries were compared. We also queried the NC death certificate and child welfare databases. Data were analyzed by standard statistical methods using chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Total pediatric trauma cases were lower during 2020 (71.6 per 100,000) compared to 2018 (92.4 per 100,000) and 2019 (80 per 100,000) (P < .001); however, average injury severity score (ISS) was higher (P = .001). A significant increase in firearm injuries were seen in 2020 (P = .016), with an increase in mortality (P = .08) and ISS (P = .013). The rate of child abuse trauma decreased in 2020 (P = .005) as did the number of child abuse and neglect reports (P < .001). There were also significant decreases in trauma due to sports, burns, falls, and motor vehicle accidents. CONCLUSION: While overall pediatric trauma decreased during the Covid-19 pandemic, there was an alarming increase in penetrating injuries in children. Child abuse trauma and reports decreased, which is concerning for lower identification of abuse.

Penetrating neck injury during the COVID-19 pandemic - changing patterns in prevalence, aetiology & patient demographics at a Major Trauma Centre

Introduction/Aims: The UK has spent the past 2 years under varying degrees of social restrictions due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The impact on individuals, especially those who are more vulnerable to the effects of isolation, has been discussed in the literature. King's College Hospital serves an area with a high prevalence of knife crime, and the maxillofacial surgery team manages penetrating neck injuries (PNI). Material(s) and Method(s): Data were collected prospectively, and reviewed retrospectively, over a 54-month period from September 2016 - March 2021. All patients identified as having a penetrating injury to the neck were included. Data during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic were compared with the preceding 3 years for prevalence, injury characteristics, aetiology and demographics. Results/Statistics: Comparing 2016-19 with period during COVID-19, annual penetrating trauma to all body parts remained stable (447 vs. 458). PNI numbers increased (26 vs. 41), and deliberate self-harm (DSH) tripled as aetiology (5 vs. 14), accounting for 34% of all PNI cases during the COVID-19 pandemic (vs. 17%). Male patients represented a larger proportion of patients in the study group compared with previous years. Conclusions/Clinical Relevance: The number of patients presenting with penetrating neck trauma has increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The number and proportion of injuries attributable to DSH has also risen significantly. It is essential to understand that societal restrictions due to COVID-19 can impact on the incidence of PNI and DSH Copyright © 2022

Alcohol use and trauma in Alberta after COVID-19 lockdown: Overrepresentation and undertreatment are opportunities for improvement

Background: Alcohol is a major factor in traumatic injuries. Accreditation bodies recommend alcohol screening and intervention programs as trauma quality indicators. Previous research in Alberta reported increasing alcohol use prevalence in major trauma. The COVID-19 pandemic has also been linked to increased alcohol consumption. Our objective was to characterize injury characteristics and their relationship to alcohol use during the summer trauma season after the COVID-19 lockdown, and compliance with alcohol misuse screening, at a level 1 trauma centre in Edmonton, Alberta. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective chart audit for trauma patients aged 18-64 years who were admitted to the University of Alberta Hospital Trauma Service from June 1 to Aug. 31, 2020. Variables included demographics, injury characteristics, ethanol level on presentation, history of substance use and screening or intervention. Tertiary surveys as well as psychiatry and addictions consultations were reviewed to assess compliance with screening and intervention. Frequencies and basic descriptives were calculated. Logistic regression was performed to identify relationships between alcohol use and injury patterns. Result(s): A total of 176 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 40 (standard deviation [SD] 13.8) years, and 128 (72.7%) were male. Blunt injuries were most common (144 patients [81.8%] had a blunt injury, 27 [15.3%] had a penetrating injury and 3 [1.7%] had a burn), with average Injury Severity Score 13 (1-45) and average length of stay 10.6 (SD 14.6) days. Motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) predominated (66 patients, 37.5%) followed by falls (33 patients, 18.8%), sport-related injuries (30 patients, 17.1%) and stabbings (17 patients, 9.7%). A total of 156 patients (88.6%) had an ethanol level drawn on presentation;50 (32%) were positive, and 33 of these (66%) were legally intoxicated. Forty-five patients (25.6%) had a documented addiction history with alcohol use disorder, 29 of whom presented with a positive ethanol level. Of the 50 patients with elevated ethanol level on presentation, the average age was 36 (SD 12.1) years and the mean ethanol level was 36.9 (SD 23.3) mmol/L. MVCs were the most common mechanism (18 patients, 36%). Screening for alcohol use disorder was performed in 39 (78%) of these 50 patients who presented with a positive ethanol level (unclear documentation in the remainder). Addiction services were offered to 10 of 50 patients (20%). Positive ethanol level was associated with younger age (36 v. 41 yr, p = 0.02). Logistic regression revealed that positive ethanol level was significantly associated with stab mechanism of injury (odds ratio [OR] 3.75, 96% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-11.6, p < 0.05);intoxication further increased association with stab injury (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.4-15, p < 0.01). Conclusion(s): The prevalence of positive ethanol level in trauma patients is rising: 32% currently, compared with 24% from Alberta 2010 data. Over one-quarter of MVC patients had a positive ethanol level, and intoxication increased the odds of stab injury. Compliance with alcohol misuse screening was 78% with only 20% of patients offered intervention, despite 58% having alcohol use disorder. Interventions to reduce preventable injuries and alcohol misuse at the population and hospital levels are needed..

Penetrating abdominal trauma: Evaluation in Baghdad during the pandemic Covid-19

Background: Trauma is one of the leading causes of deaths worldwide for all age groups, especially in the younger age group. The purpose of the current study is to assess/analyze the factors for mortality in penetrating abdominal traumas with respect to the total number of intra-abdominal organs injured, related extra-abdominal injuries, gender, type of injury, time of arrival, and amount of blood transfusion needed during the pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study including 523 patients underwent laparotomy in Al-Emamien Al-Kadhimin Medical City from March 2020 to September 2021 for a penetrating abdominal injury due to blast injury, bullet, shrapnel injury, and stab wounds. The study population with penetrating abdominal traumas and indicative abdominal signs was subjected to exploratory laparotomy. Results: In this study, 465 (88.9%) males and 58 (11.1%) females participated;the highest rate was found in small bowel injuries (40.73%) followed by large bowel injuries (21.99%), whereas the lowest rate was found in gallbladder injury (1.34%). Chest injuries represent the highest rate among extra-abdominal injuries (18.36%), whereas head and neck represent the lowest rate (1.34%). Regarding the risk factors affecting the mortality rate, the highest rate of mortality was found in the case of gunshot (13.11%), followed by shrapnel (6.38%) and stab wound injuries (5.26%), which was the lowest. Conclusion: Penetrating abdominal injuries were the most common among males, small bowel injuries are the commonest organs affected by the penetrating abdominal injuries, shrapnel injuries were the commonest causes in our country, and the highest mortality rate was related to gunshot and number of organs affected and delay of arrival to the hospital and number of pints of blood received.

The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Penetrating Neurotrauma at a Level 1 Trauma Center

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic forced the implementation of social distancing guidelines to minimize spread of the coronavirus. However, it is not yet understood what effects these precautions had on the rates of penetrating neurotrauma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed neurotrauma data from our institutional trauma registry from distinct periods defined as pre-COVID-19 (March 2019-September 2019) and COVID-19 (March 2020-September 2020). Demographics, injury characteristics, mechanisms of trauma, and past medical history (including psychiatric diagnosis) were collected. Data were analyzed for between-group differences and presented as odds ratios. RESULTS: We observed a significant rise in the number of neurotrauma cases in 2020 (558 vs. 630, OR 1.129 [1.0071, 1.2657]). There was a decrease in the proportion of male victims (71.3% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.03). There were significant differences noted in the mechanism of injury between groups. Patients in 2020 were less likely to present with falls (42.3% vs. 34.3%, OR 0.7119 [0.5627, 0.9005]) and more likely to present with GSW (4.48% vs. 7.78%, OR 1.7981 [1.0951, 2.9523]). Of the patients with penetrating cranial injuries, the most common motive was assault (56.7% vs. 60.0%), followed by self-inflicted (13.3% vs. 20.0%) and accidental (20.0% vs. 18.3%) with a significant difference between years (p = 0.0043). The presence of comorbid psychiatric illness or substance abuse did not confer an increased odds of presenting with penetrating injuries. No significant differences were noted in mean arrival or discharge GCS or injury severity as measured by ISS. However we did observe significant increases in patients presenting with bilaterally reactive pupils (48.3% vs 59.3%, p = 0.0025), patients discharged home (27.6% vs 37.3%, p = 0.0002), and survival at 6 months (41.4% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.0188). CONCLUSION: We observed a higher rate of penetrating neurotrauma while social distancing measures were in place. It is unclear if the psychosocial effects of quarantine and social distancing had a causative relationship with the increased rates of assault and self-inflicted penetrating injuries.

Venous thromboembolic events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with obesity

Background: COVID-19 has been identified as a risk factor for coagulopathy leading to increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). However, the risk profile of VTE in patients with obesity -a patient population with higher risk for VTE at baseline -is poorly described. The aim of this study is to determine if obesity and BMI is associated with increased rates of VTE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: Patients admitted with confirmed Sars-CoV- 2 infections from November 2020-January 2021 were examined. Patients were excluded if they were minors, currently pregnant, or if their COVID-diagnosis was an incidental finding in the setting of an unrelated admission -i. e. penetrating trauma. Imaging results were used to verify VTE related patient outcomes, pulmonary embolisms (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). COVID-19 specific anticoagulation regimes looking at standard, intensive, and therapeutic anticoagulation were examined. Results: Of 1505 patients included in the study, 754 (50%) had BMI < 30kg/m2 and 751 (50%) had BMI >30kg/m2. DVTs occurred in 40 (2.66%) patients, with no differences in incidence between those with and without obesity (2.40% vs 2.92%;p = 0.53). PEs occurred in 35 (2.33%) of patients, with no differences in incidence between those with and without obesity (2.40% vs. 2.25%;p = 0.85). No significant differences existed in the initial intensity (p = 0.50) of anticoagulation regimen or maximum intensity (p = 0.27) between those with and without obesity. In multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, race, prior history of venous thromboembolic events, use of antiplatelet medications, and intensive care unit admission, BMI was not associated with increased odds of experiencing a DVT (OR = 0.978;95% CI 0.934, 1.024;p = 0.348) or PE (OR = 1.005;95% CI 0.959, 1.052;p = 0.849). Conclusions: Patients with obesity hospitalized for COVID-19 were not at higher risk for thromboembolic events, such as DVTs and PEs, compared to patients without obesity.

Increases in Violence and Changes in Trauma Admissions During the COVID Quarantine.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an abrupt change to societal norms. We anecdotally noticed an increase in penetrating and violent trauma during the period of stay-at-home orders. Studying these changes will allow trauma centers to better prepare for future waves of COVID-19 or other global catastrophes. METHODS: We queried our institutional database for all level 1 and 2 trauma activations presenting from the scene within our local county from March 18 to May 21, 2020 and matched time periods from 2016 to 2019. Primary outcomes were overall trauma volume, rates of penetrating trauma, rates of violent trauma, and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: The number of penetrating and violent traumas at our trauma center during the period of societal quarantine for the COVID-19 pandemic was more than any historical total. During the COVID-19 time period, we saw 39 penetrating traumas, while the mean value for the same time period from 2016 to 2019 was 26 (P = .03). We saw 45 violent traumas during COVID; the mean value from 2016 to 2019 was 32 (P = .05). There was also a higher rate of trauma patients requiring transfusion in the COVID cohort (6.7% vs 12.2%). DISCUSSION: Societal quarantine increased the number of penetrating and violent traumas, with a concurrent increased percentage of patients transfused. Despite this, there was no change in outcomes. Given the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine measures could be re-implemented. Data from this study can help guide expectations and utilization of hospital resources in the future.

Amplifying inequity: The compounding impact of COVID-19 and violence.

While "stay-at-home" orders for COVID-19 were in effect, many American cities witnessed a rise in community and interpersonal violence. Our own institution, the largest regional trauma facility and Boston's safety net hospital, saw a paradoxical rise in penetrating violent trauma admissions despite decreases in other hospital admissions, leading to our most violent summer in five years. It has been established that minoritized and marginalized communities have faced the harshest impacts of the pandemic. Our findings suggest that the conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic have amplified the inequities that exist in communities of color that place them at risk for exposure to violence. The pandemic has served to potentiate the impacts of violence already plaguing the communities and patients we serve.

Surviving traumatic cardiac arrest: Identification of factors associated with survival.

INTRODUCTION: The endpoint of resuscitative interventions after traumatic injury resulting in cardiopulmonary arrest varies across institutions and even among providers. The purpose of this study was to examine survival characteristics in patients suffering torso trauma with no recorded vital signs (VS) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was analyzed from 2007 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were patients with blunt and penetrating torso trauma without VS in the ED. Patients with head injuries, transfers from other hospitals, or those with missing values were excluded. The characteristics of survivors were evaluated, and statistical analyses performed. RESULTS: A total of 24,191 torso trauma patients without VS were evaluated in the ED and 96.6% were declared dead upon arrival. There were 246 survivors (1%), and 73 (0.3%) were eventually discharged home. Of patients who responded to resuscitation (812), the survival rate was 30.3%. Injury severity score (ISS), penetrating mechanism (odds ratio [OR] 1.99), definitive chest (OR 1.59) and abdominal surgery (OR 1.49) were associated with improved survival. Discharge to home (or police custody) was associated with lower ISS (OR 0.975) and shorter ED time (OR 0.99). CONCLUSION: Over a recent nine-year period in the United States, nearly 25,000 trauma patients were treated at trauma centers despite lack of VS. Of these patients, only 73 were discharged home. A trauma center would have to attempt over one hundred resuscitations of traumatic arrests to save one patient, confirming previous reports that highlight a grave prognosis. This creates a dilemma in treatment for front line workers and physicians with resource utilization and consideration of safety of exposure, particularly in the face of COVID-19.